Current:Home > InvestThe White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars -Wealth Empowerment Academy
The White House is threatening the patents of high-priced drugs developed with taxpayer dollars
View
Date:2025-04-13 18:28:27
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration is putting pharmaceutical companies on notice, warning them that if the price of certain drugs is too high, the government might cancel their patent protection and allow rivals to make their own versions.
Under a plan announced Thursday, the government would consider overriding the patent for high-priced drugs that have been developed with the help of taxpayer money and letting competitors make them in hopes of driving down the cost.
In a 15-second video released to YouTube on Wednesday night, President Joe Biden promised the move would lower prices.
“Today, we’re taking a very important step toward ending price gouging so you don’t have to pay more for the medicine you need,” he said.
The administration did not immediately release details about how the process will work and how it will deem a drug costly enough to act. White House officials would not name drugs that might potentially be targeted.
There will be a 60-day public comment period. If the plan is enacted, drugmakers are almost certain to challenge it in court.
It’s the latest health policy pitch from a White House gearing up to make its efforts to tackle drug prices a central theme in next year’s reelection campaign. Biden frequently talks about the $35 cap on insulin for Medicare enrollees that went into effect this year, as well as a plan for government officials to negotiate some drug prices paid by Medicare for the first time in history.
The federal government, however, has never taken such a move against patents, a step called “march-in rights.” But some Democratic lawmakers, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, has in recent years lobbied the Health and Human Services agency to do so with certain drugs.
The conditions for how those “march-in rights” would be used have long been debated. Pharmaceutical companies have pushed back on the idea that prices alone are enough for Washington to act against a drug’s patent. The process proposed by the administration would clarify that the drug’s patent could be in jeopardy if its price is out of reach for Americans, White House officials said.
“For the first time, ever, the high price of that taxpayer-funded drug is a factor in determining that the drug is not accessible to the public on reasonable terms,” said Biden domestic policy adviser Neera Tanden.
The plan could threaten future drugs, according to the pharmaceutical lobbying firm Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA.
“This would be yet another loss for American patients who rely on public-private sector collaboration to advance new treatments and cures,” PhRMA spokesperson Megan Van Etten said.
Pharmaceutical companies have long relied on government research to develop new drugs. The most recent major breakthrough was the development of COVID-19 vaccines. U.S. taxpayers invested billions of dollars in the effort and were able, until recently, to access treatments and preventions for the virus without paying out-of-pocket for them.
When the public invests heavily in a private company’s drug, it’s fair to question whether they should have to pay high prices for it, said William Pierce, a former HHS official during President George W. Bush’s administration.
“The question becomes – what reward should there be for the taxpayers who help fund this product?” Pierce said.
veryGood! (27)
Related
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- These Survivor Secrets Reveal How the Series Managed to Outwit, Outplay, Outlast the Competition
- Home for Spring Break? Here's How To Make Your Staycation Feel Like a Dream Getaway
- A new mom died after giving birth at a Boston hospital. Was corporate greed to blame?
- Trump's 'stop
- Kellogg's CEO says Americans facing inflation should eat cereal for dinner. He got mixed reactions.
- US looks at regulating connected vehicles to prevent abusers from tracking victims
- Texas wildfire becomes second-largest in state history, burning 500,000 acres
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Wendy's explores bringing Uber-style pricing to its fast-food restaurants
Ranking
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- NYC Mayor Eric Adams calls for expanded cooperation between police and immigration authorities
- Donna Summer's estate sues Ye, Ty Dolla $ign for using 'I Feel Love' without permission
- A new mom died after giving birth at a Boston hospital. Was corporate greed to blame?
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Family Dollar's rat-infested warehouse, damaged products, lead to $41.6 million fine
- Kansas City Chiefs DB Coach Says Taylor Swift Helped Travis Kelce Become a Different Man
- Why AP called Michigan for Trump: Race call explained
Recommendation
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Supreme Court to hear challenge to bump stock ban in high court’s latest gun case
About as many abortions are happening in the US monthly as before Roe was overturned, report finds
Toyota recalls 381,000 Tacoma pickup trucks to fix potential crash risk
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Chiefs' Mecole Hardman rips Jets while reflecting on turbulent tenure: 'No standard there'
Drew Barrymore's 1995 Playboy cover comes back to haunt her with daughter's sass
Key witness in Holly Bobo murder trial says his testimony was a lie, court documents show